In your opinion, what is the MOST effective way to support new students in school?

Voices from the Field is a place for administrators, teachers, school support staff, community, and family members to (1) share what you think by responding to a polling question, (2) see what others think by viewing the poll’s results, (3) learn what experts think by reading a short post that includes references and related resources, and (4) share your own experiences by posting comments on safe supportive learning topics.

In your opinion, what is the MOST effective way to support new students in school?

Learn What Experts Think

As a new school year begins many students will be changing schools. Often the change is due to advancing grades, but students may also be switching schools for a host of other reasons ranging from a family move to expulsion to reentry after hospitalization (Rumberger, 2015). Switching schools for a reason other than grade advancement is referred to as student mobility and students who experience mobility may have unique needs that make it difficult for them to adjust to a new school (Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, 2004). In order for these students to successfully adapt, it is important that the schools they are entering help them feel welcome, safe, and supported (Adelman & Taylor, 2015a).

Research suggests that students experiencing mobility are more likely to demonstrate several negative outcomes, including lower levels of proficiency, behavioral problems, and an increased likelihood of dropping out (Comey, Litschwartz, & Pettit, 2012; Folds & Tanner, 2014; Rumberger, 2015; Voight, Shinn, & Nation, 2011). To make matters worse, students who are already more likely to feel marginalized as a result of things like race, poverty, homelessness, and involvement in the foster care system are also more likely to experience mobility (Eadie et al., 2013), adding one more barrier to overcome. Student mobility also affects more than the student – it affects the school as a whole. Schools with high levels of student mobility perform worse than schools with stable populations (Comey, Litschwartz, & Pettit, 2012; Eddy, 2011; Bradbury, Burke, & Triest, 2014). Despite all of this, research suggests that highly mobile students can demonstrate outstanding resilience when it comes to academics if given support (Cutuli et al., 2013).

What can be done? Like many efforts to improve supports and outcomes for students, schools benefit from developing a multi-tiered response in order to reduce and effectively respond to challenges created by student mobility (Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA, 2007). Universal approaches benefit all students and should be incorporated into the school or classroom. Some examples of universal practices include hanging welcome signs in and outside of the school (bonus points for using multiple languages!), sending home welcome packets, and incorporating student, staff, and teacher greeters outside of school (Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA, n.d.). For students identified as needing more support with transitioning, more specific responses may be necessary. Some examples of these more selective supports include reaching out to the students’ families, pairing new students with peer-buddies, developing a transition plan with new students, providing a contact person for them to ask questions or share concerns, and regularly checking in with the students to make sure they are adjusting well (Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA, n.d.). Administrators from the previous school can also support transitioning students by creating a student profile packet to be given to the students’ new schools. Communication between schools is especially critical for students with IEPs who are transitioning (NCSET, 2012). As with anything, it is important to evaluate how well supports for mobile students are working. This can be done by tracking the progress of new students, scheduling regular meetings or phone calls with the student and their family to understand their perspective, surveying mobile students and their families, and adapting strategies based on results (Adelman & Taylor, 2015b).

Change is hard even in the best of circumstances, but with the right structures in place, schools and families can help mitigate the effects of student mobility.


Adelman, H., & Taylor, T. (2015a). Chapter 5: Supports for transitions. Transforming student and learning supports: Developing a unified, comprehensive, and equitable system (39-46). Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA.

Adelman, H., & Taylor, T. (2015b). Appendix C: Self study surveys. Transforming student and learning supports: Developing a unified, comprehensive, and equitable system (C1-C48). Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA.

Bradbury, K., Burke, M.A., & Triest, R.K. (2014). Within-school spillover effects of foreclosures and student mobility on student academic performance. Retrieved from

Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA. (n.d.). Welcoming strategies for newly arrived students and their families. Los Angeles, CA: Author

Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA. (2007). Welcoming and involving new students and families. Los Angeles, CA: Author.

Comey, J., Litschwartz, S., & Pettit, K.L.S. (2012, October). Housing and schools: Working together to reduce the negative effects of student mobility. (Urban Institute Brief No. 26). Retrieved from

Cutuli, J.J., Desjardins, C.D., Herbers, J.E., Long, J.D., Heistad, D., Chan, C., Hinz, E., & Masten, A.S. (2012). Academic achievement trajectories of homeless and highly mobile students: Resilience in the context of chronic and acute risk. Child Development (84)3, 841-857. doi:10.1111/cdev.12013

Eadie, S., Eisner, R., Miller, B., & Wolf, L. (2013). Student mobility patterns and achievement in Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin: Madison. Retrieved from

Editorial Projects in Education Research Center. (2004, August 4). Issues A-Z: Student Mobility. Education Week. Retrieved July 24, 2015 from

Eddy, L. (2011). The effect of student mobility on academic achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from

Folds, L. & Tanner, C.K. (2014). Socioeconomic status, higher-level mathematics courses, absenteeism, and student mobility as indicators of work readiness. Journal of Career and Technical Education (29)1. Retrieved from

National Center on Secondary Education and Transition (NCSET). (2012). IEP & transition planning. Retrieved from

Rumberger, R.W. (2015). Student mobility: Causes, consequences, and solutions. Retrieved from

Voight, A., Shinn, M., & Nation, M. (2011). The longitudinal effects of residential mobility on the academic achievement of urban elementary and middle school students. Educational Researcher, 41, 385-392. 

Share Your Experiences

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Be the first to share your experience!